Customize your website

AIMS report showing Sackville residents have highest tax burden in N.B. misleading: CAO



Katie Tower
Published on May 21st, 2008
Published on March 5th, 2010
Katie Tower RSS Feed

Sackville residents who were led to believe earlier this month that they have the highest average residential tax burden in the province can breathe a sigh of relief that the claim isn't quite accurate.
A new interim report on cities, towns and villages in New Brunswick - released in early May by the Atlantic Institute for Market Studies - placed Sackville at the top of the list with the highest average residential tax burden at $2,194, putting the town ahead of Dieppe, Riverview and Moncton, and well above the provincial average of $1,078.
But those numbers simply didn't add up for Sackville CAO Barry Carroll, who said he began to dig into why the figures seemed so inaccurate.
"They portrayed Sackville as being number one but that's just simply not the case," said Carroll.

Topics :
Atlantic Institute for Market Studies , Fire Service , Sackville , Port Elgin , Dorchester

Sackville residents who were led to believe earlier this month that they have the highest average residential tax burden in the province can breathe a sigh of relief that the claim isn't quite accurate.
A new interim report on cities, towns and villages in New Brunswick - released in early May by the Atlantic Institute for Market Studies - placed Sackville at the top of the list with the highest average residential tax burden at $2,194, putting the town ahead of Dieppe, Riverview and Moncton, and well above the provincial average of $1,078.
But those numbers simply didn't add up for Sackville CAO Barry Carroll, who said he began to dig into why the figures seemed so inaccurate.
"They portrayed Sackville as being number one but that's just simply not the case," said Carroll.
The CAO said both the average value of homes and the municipal tax rate in Sackville are lower than in cities like Moncton and Dieppe so it didn't make sense that Sackville was named higher on the list than those communities.
Although Carroll admits he's unsure of what the average homeowner does pay in Sackville, he said local residents are definitely not dishing out as much as the report would have them believe.
The mistake, he discovered, lays with the way the results were calculated in the AIMS?report.
"In the assessment, they included the Mount Allison properties and schools as residential," said Carroll.
In a larger city like Moncton, the impact of including those numbers wouldn't be quite so huge, he said. But for a small town like Sackville, those figures bring the average up substantially.
"Obviously with only 2,500 residential properties, if you take the taxation from even a single building from Mount A, that's going to skew the average. We're unique, we're not like Moncton or Dieppe. We have a big university in a small community."
Carroll said the final report - which is due to be released in June - will include an explanatory note to explain why Sackville's numbers show that the town has such a high tax burden.
Port Elgin and Dorchester's numbers are both below the provincial average, with the village of Port Elgin showing a residential tax burden of $858 and Dorchester revealing a burden of $974.
Entitled Have Your Say, the AIMS report is gathering a range of statistics - from average tax burden and municipal tax rate to fire and police expenses as well as economic development and recreation spending.
The municipal report card project aims to help taxpayers find answers to some of their most pressing questions on a range of topics, including: governance; taxation; police and fire services; transportation; water, sewage, and waste disposal; economic development; recreation and culture. It will allow citizens of different towns and cities to compare the quality of service, municipal taxes and budgets in their respective municipalities.
Charles Cirtwell, executive director of AIMS, said putting more information in people's hands will help to make municipal governments more accountable.
"The issue for the taxpayers in Sackville is about recognizing how much they're paying, and do they think they are getting value for all that money," he said.
Cirtwell said southeast New Brunswick has been experiencing an economic boom over the past three years and that has certainly had an effect on the burden placed on the taxpayers.
"My understanding is that several of the communities in that region are either engaging in investment in new infrastructure or are building some quality infrastructure for their local residents," he said. "And, of course, that's a choice the residents are fully entitled to make - if they want to pay extra taxes for extra services."

Highlights from the Interim Municipal Report Card
General Government
Operating Costs (per capita)

Dorchester - $155
Port Elgin - $200
Sackville - $143
Provincial average - $167

Fire Service Operating
Costs (per dwelling)

Dorchester - $329 (10th highest in N.B.)
Port Elgin - $361 (sixth highest in N.B.)
Sackville - $73 (84th out of 102 municipalities)
Provincial Average - $168

Police Operating Costs (per capita)
Dorchester - $86 (lowest in N.B.)
Port Elgin - $93 (94th out of 102)
Sackville - $248 (fourth highest in N.B.)
Provincial average - $134

Recreation and Culture
Operating Costs (per capita)

Dorchester - $58
Port Elgin - $52
Sackville - $98
Provincial average - $113

Economic Development
operating costs (per capita)

Dorchester - $23
Port Elgin - $30
Sackville - $116
Provincial average - $40

Waste Collection/Disposal
Fees (per dwelling)

Dorchester - $159
Port Elgin - $115
Sackville - $118
Provincial average - $120

Water costs (per dwelling)
Dorchester - $175
Port Elgin - $138
Sackville - $216
Provincial average - $229
(Source: Have Your Say, interim municipal report card for N.B., AIMS, www.aims.ca/library/imrc.pdf)

Comments

  • Username
    Chris
    - March 8th, 2010 at 14:16:44

    Why is no one talking about the fact that Sackville has the 4th highest policing cost per capita in the province?!?

    Submit a Comment

Submit a Comment

Submit a Comment

This form is NOT used for emailing the article to a friend. Please use the "Send to a friend" link at the top of the page for that purpose.

The Sackville Tribune Post is not responsible for posted comments. Please be polite and confine your comments to the subject of the posted story. If you have an account, please sign on to it..

(we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Advertising

Ad Finder

February 8th 2012

View our Newspaper ads

Newsletter

Please enter your email to receive our free newsletter

Subscribe to news alerts

Advertising