• Print
  • Send to a friend
  • Comment (0)
  •  

Council opens up monthly discussion meetings

Katie Tower
Published on April 22, 2009
Published on March 5, 2010
Katie Tower  RSS Feed

In another move towards greater transparency, members of Sackville town council have decided to open up their monthly discussion meetings to the public saying they have nothing to hide.
"We're constantly getting a lot of information behind closed doors," said Coun. Margaret Tusz-King, who introduced the motion last week to open up the monthly sessions. "And so I propose we have our discussion group meetings open to the public so they will know the issues we're talking about and the questions we're asking."

Topics :
Sackville town council

In another move towards greater transparency, members of Sackville town council have decided to open up their monthly discussion meetings to the public saying they have nothing to hide.
"We're constantly getting a lot of information behind closed doors," said Coun. Margaret Tusz-King, who introduced the motion last week to open up the monthly sessions. "And so I propose we have our discussion group meetings open to the public so they will know the issues we're talking about and the questions we're asking."
Tusz-King explained that, according to the provincial Municipalities Act, issues surrounding legal, personnel and land matters are subject to privacy laws but anything else can be brought to the table during public sessions.
Up until now, council's discussion meetings have been regularly closed to the public but the upcoming meetings on May 4 and June 1 will be opened up, with town staff looking into how it can change its procedural bylaw to allow local residents access to all future discussion meetings.
Advanced notification of topics to be discussed during the Monday night meetings will be posted on the town's website.
Deputy Mayor Bob Berry, who voted against the motion to open up the meetings, said he would rather let the town's bylaw committee review whether council should make the meetings public and wait for them to come back with a recommendation
"I think this is too quick," said Berry.
He said he doesn't have a problem with allowing the public into the meetings but did raise concerns over the possible length of the sessions should there be a number of questions from residents.
"If you have too many items on the agenda, you're going to be there all night," said Berry.
Councillors Bruce Phinney and Joyce O'Neil also voted against the motion, stating they were also worried about the time crunch and questioned whether they would be able to get as much done during the open meetings.
But Coun. Merrill Fullerton justified the move, stating that talk of opening up the discussion meetings has been on the table since the new council took office following last year's municipal elections.
"I think it's time we deal with this. There are easy measures that can be put in place to do this; if we need to go into a committee-of-the-whole session (to discuss private matters), then that's what's we'll have to do."

Submit a comment

Submit a comment (we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Advertising

Ad Finder

May 24th 2013

View our Newspaper ads

Newsletter

Please enter your email to receive our free newsletter

Subscribe to news alerts

Advertising